In Reply to: RE: The NAD is contemporary with a Dynaco Mk3, is it? posted by E-Stat on December 17, 2015 at 09:57:14:
"Better caps provide more transparency and top end resolution." Your comment. Since tube amps use better quality caps than the typical SS amp, doesn't that mean a qualitative edge for a tube amp over SS?
I also thing you're attributing things to me that I have not said. I have said that the higher source impedance of tube amps does interact with the impedance of the speaker to form a frequency dependent voltage divider. However, I have also stated in this forum that it only works with a speaker who's impedance varies by 4 or 5 to 1 from minimum to maximum. Your electrostatics are not a suitable test. If you doubt this, look at some of the amplifier tests in Stereophile, where the interaction shows up clearly in the amp's frequency response when measured with a simulated speaker load. It's a premise that is well proven and follows from basic EE theory. John Atkinson wrote an article on it, and it was in their archives. I can e mail you a copy if you can't find it; but I'll need your current e mail.
However, that's not enough. Even if you EQ out that frequency response shift, (and I have) there is still some remaining difference in the sound. I'm simply suggesting that the inherently better caps might be part of the answer.
Jerry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The NAD is contemporary with a Dynaco Mk3, is it? - Bold Eagle 17:12:02 12/17/15 (8)
- Clarification - E-Stat 06:13:02 12/18/15 (7)
- RE: Clarification - Crazy Dave 08:47:26 12/18/15 (6)
- RE: Clarification - E-Stat 13:07:49 12/18/15 (5)
- RE: Clarification - Crazy Dave 09:26:39 12/22/15 (2)
- RE: Clarification - E-Stat 10:44:03 12/22/15 (1)
- RE: Clarification - Crazy Dave 15:10:44 12/22/15 (0)
- 6C33CB / 6S33SV ? (nt) - Steve O 18:39:19 12/18/15 (1)
- Oops, yep 6C33 type - E-Stat 06:12:23 12/19/15 (0)