In trying to describe the sound after installing the bypass caps in my NAD C350, it dawned on me that the descriptors I was using also fit "tube sound". So the sound of my modded C350 could be described as "tubey". Then, I realized that tube gear doesn't use electrolytic coupling caps. So, how much of "tube sound" Vs "SS sound" is due to the difference in caps?
I know there are numerous other reasons for the differences, so please, just focus on the coupling caps.
OK, an anecdote. Many years ago, a friend gave me an Acoustech Mk IV solid state integrated amp. It had been assembled from a kit, and modified by engineers and technicians at Fisher's Long Island labs. They had added electrolytic caps to bypass certain resistors for stability, and then bypassed the electrolytics with 0.068 uF film caps. It had a very "tubey" sound, which I always associated with the output coupling cap - but maybe not?
Jerry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Tube sound - how much is due to the caps? - Bold Eagle 06:58:28 12/13/15 (55)
- RE: Tube sound - how much is due to the caps? - Bold Eagle 11:36:03 12/20/15 (2)
- This is all fine and good but.... - Steve O 13:11:14 12/20/15 (1)
- RE: This is all fine and good but.... - Bold Eagle 13:38:40 12/20/15 (0)
- RE: I'm with Andy......"tube sound" equals something wrong - Russ57 18:25:27 12/16/15 (3)
- RE: I'm with Andy......"tube sound" equals something wrong - Bold Eagle 19:09:08 12/16/15 (2)
- RE: To try and get closer to your question - Russ57 20:10:24 12/16/15 (1)
- RE: To try and get closer to your question - Crazy Dave 11:08:28 12/17/15 (0)
- Tube sound - now that we have it - how do we get rid of it - airtime 06:52:15 12/15/15 (0)
- You used to be certain it was the ouput impedance/damping factor, no? - Timbo in Oz 02:21:01 12/15/15 (15)
- RE: You used to be certain it was the ouput impedance/damping factor, no? - Bold Eagle 18:27:52 12/15/15 (14)
- I would not use electrolytics for coupling anywhere I can fit in a film or film and foil cap. - Timbo in Oz 19:29:56 12/15/15 (13)
- RE: I would not use electrolytics for coupling anywhere I can fit in a film or film and foil cap. - Bold Eagle 19:12:11 12/16/15 (12)
- The NAD is contemporary with a Dynaco Mk3, is it? - Timbo in Oz 03:15:10 12/17/15 (11)
- RE: The NAD is contemporary with a Dynaco Mk3, is it? - Bold Eagle 08:02:12 12/17/15 (10)
- RE: The NAD is contemporary with a Dynaco Mk3, is it? - E-Stat 09:57:14 12/17/15 (9)
- RE: The NAD is contemporary with a Dynaco Mk3, is it? - Bold Eagle 17:12:02 12/17/15 (8)
- Clarification - E-Stat 06:13:02 12/18/15 (7)
- RE: Clarification - Crazy Dave 08:47:26 12/18/15 (6)
- RE: Clarification - E-Stat 13:07:49 12/18/15 (5)
- RE: Clarification - Crazy Dave 09:26:39 12/22/15 (2)
- RE: Clarification - E-Stat 10:44:03 12/22/15 (1)
- RE: Clarification - Crazy Dave 15:10:44 12/22/15 (0)
- 6C33CB / 6S33SV ? (nt) - Steve O 18:39:19 12/18/15 (1)
- Oops, yep 6C33 type - E-Stat 06:12:23 12/19/15 (0)
- 'Tube sound' can be very misleading. - andy evans 09:20:39 12/14/15 (4)
- RE: 'Tube sound' can be very misleading. - Bold Eagle 18:41:15 12/15/15 (2)
- Transformers and SIT amps - andy evans 03:44:17 12/16/15 (1)
- RE: Transformers and SIT amps - Bold Eagle 19:16:55 12/16/15 (0)
- RE: 'Tube sound' can be very misleading. - Brian McGowan 12:46:19 12/14/15 (0)
- I cannot find the link but i remember and old post here ... - beppe61 06:55:33 12/14/15 (0)
- Capacitors definitely vary in linearity - E-Stat 14:18:46 12/13/15 (15)
- RE: Capacitors definitely vary in linearity - Bold Eagle 18:45:00 12/15/15 (1)
- Sorry - E-Stat 19:53:59 12/15/15 (0)
- I rarely disagree with you but.... - airtime 06:18:01 12/14/15 (6)
- RE: I rarely disagree with you but.... - E-Stat 06:23:10 12/14/15 (5)
- RE: I rarely disagree with you but.... - airtime 06:25:19 12/14/15 (4)
- Addition to my rant - airtime 06:35:53 12/14/15 (2)
- RE: Addition to my rant - Crazy Dave 12:06:14 12/14/15 (0)
- RE: Addition to my rant - E-Stat 06:53:44 12/14/15 (0)
- In 1975 - E-Stat 06:32:47 12/14/15 (0)
- "Never was the all film result "edgy" "... - Steve O 18:14:44 12/13/15 (5)
- RE: "Never was the all film result "edgy" "... - Bold Eagle 18:50:29 12/15/15 (0)
- Perhaps - E-Stat 05:50:59 12/14/15 (0)
- RE: "Never was the all film result "edgy" "... - Michael Samra 18:25:32 12/13/15 (2)
- RE: "Never was the all film result "edgy" "... - Steve O 18:41:48 12/13/15 (1)
- RE: "Never was the all film result "edgy" "... - Michael Samra 00:00:45 12/15/15 (0)
- RE: Tube sound - how much is due to the caps? - Michael Samra 10:17:02 12/13/15 (6)
- Mr. Samra, good to see you back. (nt) - bouncy ball 18:50:37 12/13/15 (1)
- RE: Mr. Samra, good to see you back. (nt) - Brian McGowan 07:19:29 12/14/15 (0)
- RE: Tube sound - how much is due to the caps? - Bold Eagle 13:33:45 12/13/15 (3)
- RE: Tube sound - how much is due to the caps? - Michael Samra 18:17:58 12/13/15 (2)
- RE: Tube sound - how much is due to the caps? - Bold Eagle 18:59:12 12/15/15 (0)
- Good to see you back, Mike! - FenderLover 23:53:19 12/13/15 (0)
- I don't think so - airtime 08:25:46 12/13/15 (0)
- RE: Tube sound - how much is due to the caps? - Poinzy 07:12:17 12/13/15 (0)