In Reply to: RE: HH Scott 121c follow up.. posted by rosendds@frontiernet.net on January 10, 2015 at 15:07:26:
I think you are replying to me and not Mikey? he assisted me but has not restored or heard the units you are asking about...
in short.. "big" difference, not small, incredible separation and more holographic than the stereo versions. You have a separate power supply for each channel, so good advantage there..but really you expect them to be very different, the circuit designs are not very similar at all, in fact they do not resemble one another much if you compare the schematics.
I initially thought what you were thinking, and I would still think that, if I saw the same "parts" replacement, but there is not anything similar after the rectifier bridge.
Which is better, well obviously you know my answer,, took only two nights of listening to these and I knew I had to have a pair..was not planning on a switch, but gotta have.. they are way better performers. Better dynamics across the board clearer definition 150hz -20hz. Increased transient sound. I am hearing instruments just resonating back and forth all over the room, with more in depth accuracy and definition... it's a crazy good set up not just for 78's they are good all over.
As soon as I get a pair I am selling my other pre-amps..
J
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: HH Scott 121c follow up.. - mr9iron 19:03:53 01/10/15 (3)
- RE: HH Scott 121c follow up.. - rosendds@frontiernet.net 05:07:58 01/11/15 (2)
- RE: HH Scott 121c follow up.. - mr9iron 13:02:52 01/11/15 (0)
- RE: HH Scott 121c follow up.. - Michael Samra 07:31:43 01/11/15 (0)