Audio Research produced their first amplifiers in the early 70's and by the mid 70's were considered to be one of the original "High End" companies as we use the term today.
Looking back, their first products were introduced barely 10years after the industry changed to SS designs. Meaning that older AR amps are actually much closer in age to "classic" vintage amps than to more modern designs. If one were to aquire an AR amp from the mid 70s, it would be 40yrs old. It would be prudent to at least check if not replace all of the caps and check the reistors etc, just as one would for a vintage Fisher or Heathkit amp produced in the early 60's.
But- AR is considered to be "modern", while Fisher, Scott, Heathkit, Pilot etc are considered to be "vintage".
Did 10 years really make that much difference ?
Why ?
Thanks !
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Audio Research VS. Golden Age Amplifiers - Ross 07:41:26 07/15/14 (11)
- Why? William Zane Johnson proved to the audiophile world that... - Cleantimestream 09:44:12 07/20/14 (0)
- RE: Audio Research VS. Golden Age Amplifiers - hahax@verizon.net 20:42:12 07/15/14 (0)
- Oh yes........ - viridian 17:47:19 07/15/14 (1)
- Agreed. On the other hand I have a modified ARC LS3 that is transparent as all get out. Very simply Schemo~nT - Cleantimestream 08:50:01 07/20/14 (0)
- Don't know about the assigned label, but... - E-Stat 16:16:36 07/15/14 (2)
- RE: Don't know about the assigned label, but... - kentaja 08:24:39 07/16/14 (1)
- Cool! - E-Stat 10:37:13 07/16/14 (0)
- A bit of clarification regarding abbreviations - 1973shovel 11:31:13 07/15/14 (1)
- RE: A bit of clarification regarding abbreviations - Brian Levy 15:57:00 07/15/14 (0)
- RE: Audio Research VS. Golden Age Amplifiers - Brian Levy 10:15:33 07/15/14 (0)
- Yes - airtime 08:28:39 07/15/14 (0)