In Reply to: Michael S., about your by-line..... posted by vinnie2 on March 1, 2014 at 03:18:17:
"Isn't it really all about what sounds good to the listener?"
One of these days I want to start a discussion of this. Where does "high fidelity" fit into this?. Fidelity as defined by Oxford is "The degree of exactness with which something is copied or reproduced".
I think high fidelity as a goal is critically important, and sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who thinks so.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - Jim McShane 18:08:37 03/01/14 (14)
- No, you're not... - Lee of Omaha 06:57:11 03/05/14 (1)
- RE: No, you're not... - Michael Samra 14:40:45 03/05/14 (0)
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - vinnie2 04:40:21 03/02/14 (7)
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - Jim McShane 10:47:29 03/02/14 (5)
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - vinnie2 03:51:48 03/03/14 (2)
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - Jim McShane 10:04:09 03/03/14 (1)
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - vinnie2 03:50:24 03/05/14 (0)
- Which System . . . - FlaCharlie 11:45:05 03/02/14 (1)
- RE: Which System . . . - Jim McShane 12:28:39 03/02/14 (0)
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - xaudiomanx 09:31:35 03/02/14 (0)
- RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... - Eli Duttman 21:50:13 03/01/14 (3)
- I think high fidelity as a goal is critically important, and sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who thinks - Michael Samra 23:29:16 03/01/14 (2)
- RE: I think high fidelity as a goal is critically important, and sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who thinks - Jim McShane 10:50:42 03/02/14 (1)
- it just seems to me that over the last few years especially much of the focus has moved away from the pursuit - Michael Samra 19:30:51 03/02/14 (0)