In Reply to: Re: Burhoe Acoustics update posted by johng on March 7, 2007 at 12:24:13:
I did "actually" read you post. I saw that you owned them and said "they are what they are and that's nothing more than better than average box speakers." I did not detect much fondness in that statement, but I was not trying to misrepresent you opinion. I can accept that someone can be fond of an average box speaker. Hopefully, you can accept that a person could think otherwise even when they had acutally read you post.The original poster claimed that the speakers sounded "penominal" in comparison with drivers with a trashed surrond. He also was not familliar with the brand, paid only $10 and was not expecting much. In this context I suspect his assesment was correct.
Brian ponted out that this was an all out effort from a top desingner which makes a huge change in the context of the evaluation. My read is that he was trying to be helpful, not critical. After all, the original poster could bring the speakers to original specs with new surrounds.
Dave
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Burhoe Acoustics update - Crazy Dave 13:38:13 03/07/07 (7)
- Re: Burhoe Acoustics update - johng 08:41:20 03/08/07 (6)
- Re: Burhoe Acoustics update - Crazy Dave 10:44:51 03/08/07 (5)
- Re: Burhoe Acoustics update - johng 12:38:28 03/08/07 (4)
- Re: Burhoe Acoustics update - Crazy Dave 09:31:34 03/09/07 (3)
- I would disagree - johng 14:01:33 03/09/07 (2)
- Also note... - Crazy Dave 15:11:29 03/12/07 (0)
- Re: I would disagree - Crazy Dave 09:12:25 03/12/07 (0)