RE: Query on old tuner sensitivity measurement standards

Radio Road

Which tuner to get and getting the most from it. Thank God, for the radio!

In Reply to: Query on old tuner sensitivity measurement standards posted by openmind on October 21, 2013 at 11:06:48:

The convention seems to be to quote RMS voltages (not peak) for such measurements; that is the convention used at these sites which quote both uV and dBf:

http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/advent-400
http://home.iprimus.com.au/toddemslie/howtoselectatunerforfmdx.html
http://www.chuckhawks.com/stereo_tuners.htm
http://www.magnumdynalab.com/x_revft11.htm

The IHF is kaput; I can only presume 300 ohms was the IHF standard load for tuners.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Signature Sound

[ Signature Sound Lounge ]

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Query on old tuner sensitivity measurement standards - openmind 11:06:48 10/21/13 (1)

RE: Query on old tuner sensitivity measurement standards - openmind 09:02:23 10/22/13 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Query on old tuner sensitivity measurement standards - openmind 09:02:23 10/22/13 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.