In Reply to: 6SJ7 conversion to 12AX7 posted by stevenelaw@sbcglobal.net on June 13, 2005 at 21:42:07:
Generally speaking, all that's required is to connect one section of the 12AX7 to the respective anode-grid-filament pins of the 6SJ7 socket. At $40, you're paying quite a bit for the convenience of a 12AX7 and whatever mechanical contrivance is supplied to physically mate with the octal socket. Given the inferior sonics of the 12AX7, I would suggest that you consider a 6SL7 instead. Rewiring the existing octal socket would allow a 6SL7 to be installed directly. Very little of the existing circuitry, in terms of component values, should require modification. I'll add that plugging in a 12AX7 with existing values is not likely to provide best results, either. If this is a high end amplifier, the conversion to another tube type from the 6SJ7 won't be strictly plug and play, no matter what someone may tell you. Sonics will suffer if the circuit isn't optimized. Incidentally, there are tons of 6SJ7s available on eBay, and audio suppliers generally have a good quantity of NOS at reasonable prices. Angela is currently selling a 10-pack of US-made chrome-dome WGT JANs w/metal base for $50. That's $5 each, probably 1/5 the cost of a 12AX7 of similar quality. Rather than switching to something else, this might be the time to pick up a few bargains for your amp!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 6SJ7 conversion to 12AX7 - Triode_Kingdom 22:32:56 06/13/05 (23)
- Link? To sleeve pricing? (pic) - LineArrayNut 15:15:16 06/14/05 (0)
- Re: 6SJ7 conversion to 12AX7 - fatbottle 07:46:11 06/14/05 (0)
- "inferior"? In what sense? - Joelt 05:18:30 06/14/05 (18)
- Sonically - Triode_Kingdom 08:19:19 06/14/05 (16)
- Who cares! - cheap-Jack 11:14:58 06/14/05 (14)
- the PAS is a good example - Homer Jay 16:00:00 06/14/05 (0)
- Lets consider that this is a DIY forum - Russ57 12:32:54 06/14/05 (12)
- Re: Lets consider that this is a DIY forum - Joelt 15:03:00 06/14/05 (1)
- Yes, you've said it. (nt) - cheap-Jack 18:48:34 06/14/05 (0)
- You make your point, but... - cheap-Jack 13:42:16 06/14/05 (1)
- So, why not be constructive instead of setting up flames! - Homer Jay 16:02:10 06/14/05 (0)
- But even more important... - Triode_Kingdom 13:20:52 06/14/05 (7)
- how about some numbers - Joelt 14:56:05 06/14/05 (6)
- How about ALL the numbers... - Triode_Kingdom 20:02:35 06/14/05 (4)
- how about them... - Joelt 06:35:58 06/15/05 (3)
- Not real world - Triode_Kingdom 08:18:47 06/15/05 (2)
- Welcome to the 'real world". - cheap-Jack 12:29:07 06/15/05 (0)
- you're changing the parameters of your argument - Joelt 09:21:42 06/15/05 (0)
- You're just confusing the opinions with facts Joel. - kyle 15:13:51 06/14/05 (0)
- Re: Sonically - Joelt 09:12:34 06/14/05 (0)
- Agreed. All depends on design. (nt) - cheap-Jack 07:33:42 06/14/05 (0)
- Re: 6SJ7 conversion to 12AX7 - stevenelaw@sbcglobal.net 23:06:00 06/13/05 (1)
- Re: 6SJ7 conversion to 12AX7 - Triode_Kingdom 08:12:10 06/14/05 (0)