In Reply to: RE: That is why good trials must be double-blinded,... posted by PakProtector on September 21, 2016 at 03:42:35:
What I do is to listen to the system with the new device for at least several weeks and then go back to the "before" condition for several more weeks. And ideally, you (or I) should go back to the new device, to see if you (or I) still love it so much or so little. But in practice, I am lazy. Seat of the pants rules. Which is why I am loathe to trumpet my conclusions. My data are usually bad. Thus I sometimes marvel at the degree of certainty about anything, often seen here.
Edits: 09/26/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: That is why good trials must be double-blinded,... - Lew 11:44:21 09/26/16 (1)
- RE: That is why good trials must be double-blinded,... - PakProtector 04:05:22 09/27/16 (0)