In Reply to: RH84 test amp: multiple problems found ... posted by deathtube 667 on September 23, 2016 at 17:24:17:
Hi DT, i have found that the LM317 to be less than reliable in the cathode bias duties. I have changed out almost everyone that i installed. I suspect that it is the heat from the tubes that makes them fail at a high rate but it maybe some other issue. Sometimes the power tube won't even red plate when they fail which can be tricky unless you have a test point. I was putting a heat sink on them to keep them from failing but even that did not seem to help as eventually some of them failed again. I mounted some on the outer chassis of an amp that i sold but i am not sure if that pair of ccs is still working. It is probably better to go back to a bias resistor in terms of reliability.
Thanx for posting your distortion measurements of the amp as many critics have dissed the rh amps simply because the driver tube selected is a 12at7 which they claim is a "distortion producer" and thus the design can not be "hi fi". I think your measurements show that discussion to be untrue. cheers, Dak
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: RH84 test amp: multiple problems found ... - DAK 11:03:24 09/24/16 (10)
- RE: RH84 test amp: multiple problems found ... - deathtube 667 12:22:48 09/24/16 (0)
- RE: RH84 test amp: multiple problems found ... - Tre' 11:50:44 09/24/16 (8)
- Actually - Russ57 17:17:11 09/26/16 (3)
- circuit in question - Tre' 18:03:18 09/26/16 (2)
- RE: driver stage distortion... - deathtube 667 19:19:44 09/26/16 (1)
- RE: driver stage distortion... - Tre' 19:45:51 09/26/16 (0)
- RE: One is not limited to 12at7 - DAK 15:15:35 09/24/16 (3)
- RE: One is not limited to 12at7 - Tre' 15:35:05 09/24/16 (2)
- RE: One is not limited to 12at7 - DAK 17:06:56 09/24/16 (1)
- RE: One is not limited to 12at7 - Tre' 17:25:11 09/24/16 (0)