In Reply to: Amen, to that posted by FenderLover on September 13, 2016 at 14:29:18:
That's for sure.
Case in point, if there was a clear reason why changing the leads on the cap would make a big difference then OK, but the fact is a screen grid bypass cap merely holds the screed grid at AC ground.
There is no way mathematically that the tiny difference in the resistance, inductance, capacitance, dielectric absorption, etc.. between the stock lead wires and the new added lead wires would hold the screen grid enough closer to ground to make the claimed difference. "dynamics just soared with the modified caps"
In this case one would have to do a DBT. If a claimant and/or other listeners could show statistically significant results in a DBT then we would need to look for a different reason for the change.
In the mean time, expectation bias is more likely the cause of what is being "heard".
If someone secretly undid the change I don't believe the listener would notice that the system had lost the perceived added dynamics.
The listener would assume that the modified leads were still in place and the expectation would remain, so the perceived improvement would remain.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Amen, to that - Tre' 14:49:08 09/13/16 (11)
- Great discussion, guys.... - Lew 17:49:17 09/13/16 (10)
- RE: Great discussion, guys.... - Tre' 18:32:01 09/13/16 (3)
- we all know caps change {usually lower} impedance... there it is... - Cleantimestream 20:52:43 09/13/16 (2)
- RE: we all know caps change {usually lower} impedance... there it is... - Tre' 07:24:13 09/14/16 (1)
- Gee, I have nothing to contribute that will bring more light on the subject, just heat-nT - Cleantimestream 12:47:41 09/14/16 (0)
- RE: Great discussion, guys.... - FenderLover 18:13:55 09/13/16 (5)
- RE: Great discussion, guys.... - Tre' 18:40:56 09/13/16 (4)
- "we are all so easily fooled".... - Steve O 19:23:38 09/13/16 (3)
- RE: "we are all so easily fooled".... - PakProtector 04:09:01 09/27/16 (0)
- RE: "we are all so easily fooled".... - FenderLover 19:47:50 09/13/16 (1)
- "I'd say this is impossible to completely eliminate"... - Steve O 21:07:16 09/13/16 (0)