In Reply to: RE: Totally agree ... posted by PakProtector on August 17, 2016 at 09:06:43:
"Hopefully it was conduction *at rated/maximum power*...:)"
I know what you are saying Doug, and for purposes of accurately describing an amplifier's design I agree 100%.
But from a purely engineering/physics standpoint an amp can operate in class A at low outputs while being unable to maintain/sustain it when more power and therefore larger voltage swings are required.
Does that make it a "class A amp"? IMHO no - but that doesn't prevent the amp from operating in class A under certain conditions. This reminds me of the debate about amplifier power back in the 60s/70s - just because the FTC decided RMS power was what could be advertised doesn't mean that peak power was nonexistent.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Totally agree ... - Jim McShane 17:15:17 08/17/16 (11)
- LOL... - PakProtector 18:02:07 08/17/16 (10)
- RE: LOL... - Triode_Kingdom 23:07:48 08/17/16 (9)
- RE: LOL... - dave slagle 06:56:32 08/18/16 (8)
- RE: LOL... - PakProtector 13:07:19 08/18/16 (7)
- RE: LOL... - dave slagle 13:43:32 08/18/16 (6)
- RE: LOL... - Tre' 15:56:11 08/18/16 (5)
- RE: LOL... - dave slagle 16:47:07 08/18/16 (4)
- RE: LOL... - Tre' 17:34:13 08/18/16 (3)
- RE: LOL... - dave slagle 18:24:27 08/18/16 (2)
- Soft... - PakProtector 17:23:44 08/23/16 (0)
- RE: LOL... - Tre' 18:43:12 08/18/16 (0)