In Reply to: RE: Another Comment on the 12AU7 posted by PakProtector on May 3, 2016 at 03:12:07:
"You have got to be kidding me...the 12AU7 is much cheaper. "
Do I understand your comment correctly? The 12AU7 was selected because McIntosh was too cheap to do better? I think it's just as likely that the 12AU7s they used were better than we know, or maybe even hand-picked at the factory. I'll never believe that an improvement of this magnitude would have been ignored by Mac. It doesn't make sense.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Another Comment on the 12AU7 - Triode_Kingdom 09:45:03 05/03/16 (1)
- RE: Another Comment on the 12AU7 - PakProtector 17:04:19 05/03/16 (0)