In Reply to: RE: Tube voltage doubler posted by Vincin on May 2, 2016 at 10:50:19:
I came up with that 100 muF. value, after perusing a 5U4G data sheet. A 40 muF. part is given as "typical" in the commonplace FWCT setup. As the inrush current limiter provides a margin of safety, I opted for 50 muF./5U4 plate.Using 100 muF. caps. in the stack of a "full wave" doubler is equivalent to 50 muF. in a FWCT configuration. Cap. generated "hash" should not be beyond your choke's suppression capability.
When really big caps., like the 820 muF. parts found in a "McShaned" H/K Cit. 2, are in a doubler stack, I favor inserting a "hash" filter LC section made from a high current RF choke and a 1000 pF. mica or NPO ceramic cap. between the doubler stack and the main filter choke. Here, RF energy that could pass through the main inductor's winding capacitance is a matter of concern.
BTW, a "hash" filter is never a bad idea. Even if cap. associated noise is not an issue, suppression of garbage riding on the AC mains can only help the cause.
8X Mouser stock # 647-LGN2H101MELZ40, plus voltage equalizing resistors, would make a suitable doubler stack. That part is less than 1 inch in dia. and less than 2 inches tall. Perhaps mimicking Sheldon Stokes, by etching a PCB for those caps., would be a good idea. S/S frequently engineered his cap. PCBs to mount on stand offs attached to power trafo hold down machine screws.
Eli D.
Edits: 05/02/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Tube voltage doubler - Eli Duttman 11:58:45 05/02/16 (8)
- RE: Tube voltage doubler - Tre' 14:04:18 05/02/16 (7)
- RE: Tube voltage doubler - PakProtector 10:14:02 05/05/16 (3)
- RE: Tube voltage doubler - Eli Duttman 10:53:48 05/05/16 (2)
- RE: Tube voltage doubler - Tre' 10:26:59 05/06/16 (0)
- RE: Tube voltage doubler - PakProtector 03:06:46 05/06/16 (0)
- Examples - Tre' 08:41:03 05/03/16 (2)
- RE: Examples - hennfarm 07:44:59 05/06/16 (1)
- RE: Examples - Eli Duttman 10:42:45 05/06/16 (0)