In Reply to: RE: now this might have promise...... posted by vinnie2 on July 3, 2015 at 05:30:39:
Gain is not necessarily a "problem", but the output impedance of this circuit could be. It would be roughly equal to the parallel sum of the plate resistance of the Type 27 (~9K ohms) and the 22K plate resistor. The 470K resistor is also in parallel but won't have that much effect because of its much larger value. So, you're looking at something around 7K output Z. Ideally, you'd like around a 10X higher input Z for the amplifier you would be driving, something >70K. But here I also wonder about the 0.1uF coupling capacitor, seems too low for good low frequency extension, if indeed the input Z of the amplifier is on the order of 100K or any lower.
I haven't thought about these issues for a long time. I'm sure I will be corrected if this is not entirely accurate info.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- output impedance - Lew 07:59:30 07/03/15 (12)
- RE: output impedance - Salectric 08:25:55 07/03/15 (11)
- RE: output impedance - Caucasian Blackplate 10:00:27 07/03/15 (10)
- RE: output impedance - Salectric 11:34:07 07/03/15 (9)
- Would that sound good? - Lew 16:23:15 07/03/15 (8)
- RE: Would that sound good? - Salectric 16:32:54 07/03/15 (7)
- RE: Would that sound good? - Lew 12:23:56 07/04/15 (5)
- RE: Would that sound good? - Salectric 14:01:01 07/04/15 (4)
- "On preamps with a CF the CCS made a major improvement compared to resistor loading." - Lew 17:02:07 07/04/15 (3)
- RE: "On preamps with a CF the CCS made a major improvement compared to resistor loading." - drlowmu 20:09:12 07/10/15 (2)
- RE: "On preamps with a CF the CCS made a major improvement compared to resistor loading." - Lew 21:13:24 07/12/15 (1)
- RE: "On preamps with a CF the CCS made a major improvement compared to resistor loading." - drlowmu 06:49:35 07/13/15 (0)
- RE: Would that sound good? - Tre' 16:54:06 07/03/15 (0)