In Reply to: RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 posted by mqracing on April 15, 2015 at 12:03:24:
OK Mike, I'm with you on all points.
"...are both "in addition to" the issue that VS is addressing."
But no one has addressed the issue that VS's article is about.
My read is that VS is talking about something separate from reactance changing with frequency and inductance change with current.
But all three lead me to believe that a gaped transformer is unfit for LF duties. There's just no way to get sufficient inductance with a gap.
Thank you for your input.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - Tre' 12:59:12 04/15/15 (11)
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - Caucasian Blackplate 20:43:00 04/15/15 (0)
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - mqracing 13:37:50 04/15/15 (9)
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - Tre' 14:09:39 04/15/15 (8)
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - mqracing 14:14:20 04/15/15 (7)
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - Tre' 14:57:27 04/15/15 (6)
- and you know what is weird in it's own way? - mqracing 15:12:09 04/15/15 (3)
- RE: and you know what is weird in it's own way? - Triode_Kingdom 17:46:08 04/15/15 (1)
- and the tube amp... - PakProtector 04:14:25 04/16/15 (0)
- RE: and you know what is weird in it's own way? - Tre' 15:48:42 04/15/15 (0)
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - mqracing 15:05:29 04/15/15 (1)
- RE: UTC output transformers LS-63 - Tre' 15:09:57 04/15/15 (0)