RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Signal path wire - is 28g too thin? - banpuku 12:02:17 01/27/15 (88)

RE: Signal path wire - is 28g too thin? - Stephen R 04:52:49 01/28/15 (5)

Absolutly! - gusser 10:27:39 01/28/15 (4)

RE: Absolutly! - Stephen R 10:50:07 01/28/15 (3)

RE: Absolutly! - gusser 11:02:36 01/28/15 (2)

RE: Absolutly! - Stephen R 10:10:14 01/29/15 (0)

RE: Absolutly! - RC Daniel 20:50:12 01/28/15 (0)

RE: Signal path wire - is 28g too thin? - Lew 13:23:09 01/27/15 (0)

RE: Signal path wire - is 28g too thin? - rage 12:50:30 01/27/15 (78)

RE: Signal path wire - is 28g too thin? - SteveBrown 13:19:53 01/27/15 (77)

Allen is not the only one who touted thinner is better... - Lew 17:09:57 01/27/15 (76)

RE: Allen is not the only one who touted thinner is better... - morricab 04:14:17 01/28/15 (14)

RE: Allen is not the only one who touted thinner is better... - gusser 10:42:18 01/28/15 (9)

Actually, the math... - Lew 13:35:57 01/28/15 (8)

Come on... - gusser 14:03:36 01/28/15 (7)

Whoa! - Lew 07:32:54 01/29/15 (1)

RE: Whoa! - gusser 07:57:17 01/29/15 (0)

RE: Come on... - kyle 14:10:23 01/28/15 (4)

I'm not disputing that. - gusser 14:18:56 01/28/15 (3)

RE: I'm not disputing that. - morricab 02:26:53 01/29/15 (0)

Agreed. - kyle 14:38:21 01/28/15 (1)

"a much larger bang for the buck by getting their room treatments in order" +1 - Tre' 15:55:07 01/28/15 (0)

Foil is tough to work with inside a chassis... - Lew 06:29:48 01/28/15 (3)

RE: Foil is tough to work with inside a chassis... - morricab 12:38:54 01/28/15 (2)

RE: Foil is tough to work with inside a chassis... - Lew 09:46:59 01/29/15 (1)

RE: Foil is tough to work with inside a chassis... - morricab 12:52:27 01/29/15 (0)

Just show us the relevant physics behind it! - gusser 18:07:02 01/27/15 (60)

RE: Just show us the relevant physics behind it! - Lew 19:35:48 01/27/15 (50)

Allen Wright's credentials & accomplishments trump any navel aviation art spewed in this thread-nT - Cleantimestream 03:48:00 01/28/15 (47)

Do they? - gusser 08:31:01 01/28/15 (45)

RE: Do they? - Cleantimestream 09:15:45 01/28/15 (44)

RE: Do they? - gusser 10:29:57 01/28/15 (43)

RE: Do they? - morricab 12:48:01 01/28/15 (42)

RE: Do they? - gusser 14:31:38 01/28/15 (41)

RE: Do they? - morricab 02:42:37 01/29/15 (37)

and then another part of reality is the unexplained Synergy between components-nT - Cleantimestream 03:58:56 01/29/15 (0)

RE: Do they? - cpotl 03:40:50 01/29/15 (35)

RE: Do they? - morricab 05:32:01 01/29/15 (34)

RE: Do they? - gusser 06:42:47 01/29/15 (6)

RE: Do they? - morricab 13:04:11 01/29/15 (5)

Reading: - gusser 14:34:55 01/29/15 (4)

RE: Reading: - morricab 02:27:49 01/30/15 (3)

Apples and oranges - gusser 11:50:10 01/30/15 (2)

RE: Apples and oranges - morricab 12:50:31 01/30/15 (1)

I think I get? - gusser 13:10:38 01/30/15 (0)

RE: Do they? - cpotl 06:13:54 01/29/15 (25)

Have you heard any recordings that sound like the real thing? - morricab 13:10:55 01/29/15 (6)

RE: Have you heard any recordings that sound like the real thing? - cpotl 18:20:04 01/29/15 (5)

RE: Have you heard any recordings that sound like the real thing? - morricab 13:01:46 01/30/15 (4)

RE: Have you heard any recordings that sound like the real thing? - cpotl 13:23:22 01/30/15 (3)

RE: Have you heard any recordings that sound like the real thing? - Tre' 14:12:14 01/30/15 (2)

RE: Have you heard any recordings that sound like the real thing? - gusser 14:21:02 01/30/15 (1)

RE: Have you heard any recordings that sound like the real thing? - Stephen R 05:22:29 01/31/15 (0)

RE: Do they? - RPMac 07:11:49 01/29/15 (17)

RE: Do they? - gusser 08:04:22 01/29/15 (16)

RE: Do they? - morricab 13:14:38 01/29/15 (12)

I don't get that. - gusser 14:48:52 01/29/15 (11)

RE: I don't get that. - morricab 02:32:54 01/30/15 (10)

RE: I don't get that. - op48no1 17:17:02 01/30/15 (8)

RE: I don't get that. - morricab 14:26:24 01/31/15 (7)

RE: I don't get that. - op48no1 16:15:44 01/31/15 (6)

RE: I don't get that. - morricab 11:50:41 02/01/15 (5)

RE: I don't get that. - op48no1 13:24:37 02/01/15 (4)

RE: I don't get that. - morricab 15:45:32 02/01/15 (3)

RE: I don't get that. - op48no1 17:46:20 02/01/15 (2)

RE: I don't get that. - morricab 12:55:04 02/02/15 (1)

RE: I don't get that. - op48no1 14:19:52 02/02/15 (0)

Feedback is bad? Dig deeper! - gusser 11:30:26 01/30/15 (0)

RE: Do they? - kyle 10:50:36 01/29/15 (2)

RE: Do they? - gusser 11:36:24 01/29/15 (1)

RE: Do they? - kyle 11:58:40 01/29/15 (0)

"most recordings sound like crap!" - Triode_Kingdom 05:46:08 01/29/15 (0)

Not accurate?? - Triode_Kingdom 22:30:14 01/28/15 (2)

RE: Not accurate?? - gusser 07:50:37 01/29/15 (0)

RE: Not accurate?? - morricab 02:45:47 01/29/15 (0)

But he was human like the rest of us - Triode_Kingdom 08:11:58 01/28/15 (0)

Wire - Triode_Kingdom 20:32:01 01/27/15 (1)

Thanks, TK - Lew 06:28:05 01/28/15 (0)

"relevant physics"? It is called resistance - Chip647 19:03:23 01/27/15 (8)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - danlaudionut 22:49:35 01/27/15 (4)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - cpotl 06:41:13 01/28/15 (3)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - danlaudionut 07:24:23 01/28/15 (2)

That's true for violin strings! - gusser 08:22:17 01/28/15 (0)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - cpotl 07:59:45 01/28/15 (0)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - cpotl 19:14:12 01/27/15 (2)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - Tre' 19:28:28 01/27/15 (1)

And sometimes right into a 1000 ohm grid stop resistor (nt) - Chip647 04:53:53 01/28/15 (0)

It's really simple! - gusser 12:42:51 01/27/15 (1)

+1 - Triode_Kingdom 12:59:29 01/27/15 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - cpotl 06:41:13 01/28/15 (3)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - danlaudionut 07:24:23 01/28/15 (2)

That's true for violin strings! - gusser 08:22:17 01/28/15 (0)

RE: "relevant physics"? It is called resistance - cpotl 07:59:45 01/28/15 (0)

Post a Message!