In Reply to: RE: Here's a link posted by Tre' on August 24, 2014 at 17:13:24:
"how do we define the load?"
If you skip to the conclusion at the end of the first article I linked, you'll see that Broskie doesn't recommend the SRPP for driving high impedance loads. If you NEED to use the SRPP for some reason, I suppose you could use a lower value grid resistor (a load more suited to the SRPP), and maybe that would effectively swamp the reactance of the tube. In that case, the reactance wouldn't enter into the calculation.
The link below is the article I was thinking about originally. It's an easier read, and there's a bit of comedy thrown in for good measure...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The Other SRPP Article - Triode_Kingdom 17:51:13 08/24/14 (13)
- SRPP SPICE Results - Triode_Kingdom 21:22:00 08/24/14 (12)
- RE: SRPP SPICE Results - Lew 10:56:39 08/27/14 (7)
- Bypass Cap - Triode_Kingdom 17:47:36 08/27/14 (6)
- RE: Bypass Cap - cpotl 02:17:21 08/28/14 (2)
- Good Question! - Triode_Kingdom 07:45:24 08/28/14 (1)
- More (SRPP VS Common Cathode)... - Triode_Kingdom 11:13:54 08/28/14 (0)
- RE: Bypass Cap - Tre' 21:31:13 08/27/14 (2)
- It's Worse Than That - Triode_Kingdom 06:17:29 08/28/14 (1)
- RE: It's Worse Than That - Tre' 07:30:34 08/28/14 (0)
- Screen Shot - Triode_Kingdom 22:37:34 08/24/14 (2)
- RE: Screen Shot - sideliner 08:48:35 08/25/14 (0)
- RE: Screen Shot - cpotl 03:34:38 08/25/14 (0)
- RE: SRPP SPICE Results - Jim Dowdy 21:29:36 08/24/14 (0)