In Reply to: RE: 6SF5 to 45 design help posted by danlaudionut on August 23, 2014 at 22:09:45:
Dan,
Disagree. Poor sugestion for three reasons IMHO:
1) SRPP front end, ugh
2) Cap Couple, double ugh
3) Terrible power supply throughout the amp, puke.
YMMV, etc etc. It was OK in 1994 when most didn't know better.
Jeff Medwin
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 6SF5 to 45 design help - drlowmu 07:15:44 08/24/14 (22)
- Bugle is Not SRPP - Triode_Kingdom 08:55:38 08/24/14 (20)
- Huh? - Jim Dowdy 16:30:06 08/24/14 (1)
- RE: Huh? - Triode_Kingdom 17:25:41 08/24/14 (0)
- RE: Bugle is Not SRPP - sideliner 15:56:34 08/24/14 (17)
- RE: Bugle is Not SRPP - Triode_Kingdom 16:38:14 08/24/14 (16)
- Here's a link - Triode_Kingdom 16:52:06 08/24/14 (15)
- RE: Here's a link - Tre' 17:13:24 08/24/14 (14)
- The Other SRPP Article - Triode_Kingdom 17:51:13 08/24/14 (13)
- SRPP SPICE Results - Triode_Kingdom 21:22:00 08/24/14 (12)
- RE: SRPP SPICE Results - Lew 10:56:39 08/27/14 (7)
- Bypass Cap - Triode_Kingdom 17:47:36 08/27/14 (6)
- RE: Bypass Cap - cpotl 02:17:21 08/28/14 (2)
- Good Question! - Triode_Kingdom 07:45:24 08/28/14 (1)
- More (SRPP VS Common Cathode)... - Triode_Kingdom 11:13:54 08/28/14 (0)
- RE: Bypass Cap - Tre' 21:31:13 08/27/14 (2)
- It's Worse Than That - Triode_Kingdom 06:17:29 08/28/14 (1)
- RE: It's Worse Than That - Tre' 07:30:34 08/28/14 (0)
- Screen Shot - Triode_Kingdom 22:37:34 08/24/14 (2)
- RE: Screen Shot - sideliner 08:48:35 08/25/14 (0)
- RE: Screen Shot - cpotl 03:34:38 08/25/14 (0)
- RE: SRPP SPICE Results - Jim Dowdy 21:29:36 08/24/14 (0)
- RE: 6SF5 to 45 design help - johnsonad 08:28:57 08/24/14 (0)