In Reply to: on second thought posted by unclestu on August 13, 2014 at 21:37:15:
Sheesh. You said you did "extensive DBT testing." DBT testing, by necessity, requires formal methodology and documentation. So, either the tests you did weren't proper double-blind tests, or you're withholding the data out of spite.
Or let me put it another way. If you conducted extensive double-blind tests, then you must believe in the methodology of double-blind testing. This is a point of commonality between us.
Either way, let's see the data and analysis. That would certainly be progress.
-Henry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: on second thought - op48no1 07:39:30 08/14/14 (12)
- RE: on second thought - unclestu 16:55:29 08/14/14 (11)
- RE: on second thought - Tre' 17:21:44 08/14/14 (10)
- RE: on second thought - cpotl 23:36:38 08/14/14 (0)
- RE: on second thought - dave slagle 21:12:31 08/14/14 (0)
- foolish me - unclestu 18:00:48 08/14/14 (7)
- RE: foolish me - Tre' 19:44:50 08/14/14 (6)
- A fool and his money.... - unclestu 23:14:47 08/15/14 (5)
- RE: A fool and his money.... - Tre' 08:35:39 08/16/14 (2)
- Correction... - op48no1 08:41:45 08/16/14 (1)
- Fair enough. (nt) - Tre' 10:21:59 08/16/14 (0)
- RE: A fool and his money.... - op48no1 08:32:51 08/16/14 (1)
- RE: A fool and his money.... - Tre' 11:39:25 08/16/14 (0)