In Reply to: RE: sigh, posted by Cleantimestream on August 13, 2014 at 14:07:23:
Perhaps you should define what you mean by how "magnetic" a substance is. I took your rather imprecise usage to mean the magnetic susceptibility. This characterises the magnetisation that is produced in the substance by a given applied magnetic field. The magnetisation is greater for silver than for copper.
Chris
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: sigh, - cpotl 14:12:06 08/13/14 (21)
- RE: sigh, - Cleantimestream 14:20:00 08/13/14 (20)
- Speaking of rude, - The Bored 07:27:01 08/14/14 (0)
- RE: sigh, - cpotl 14:24:45 08/13/14 (18)
- You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 14:41:31 08/13/14 (17)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 14:48:09 08/13/14 (16)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Tre' 17:18:03 08/13/14 (5)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 18:02:29 08/13/14 (4)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Tre' 20:24:14 08/13/14 (0)
- RE: You poor man~nT - dave slagle 18:29:54 08/13/14 (2)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 18:45:03 08/13/14 (1)
- In a word... - op48no1 18:47:21 08/13/14 (0)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 14:54:18 08/13/14 (9)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 15:05:28 08/13/14 (8)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 15:10:58 08/13/14 (7)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 15:21:09 08/13/14 (6)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 15:34:23 08/13/14 (5)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 15:37:37 08/13/14 (4)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 15:56:28 08/13/14 (3)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 16:05:19 08/13/14 (2)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 04:06:40 08/14/14 (1)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 05:34:41 08/14/14 (0)