In Reply to: RE: LOL !!!!! posted by cpotl on August 12, 2014 at 21:32:27:
You keep throwing numbers which in reality have NO meaning, at least not without defining the limits of human resolution. How much distortion is audible, how mucj ld deviation in frequency response...., etc., etc.
Your attempt to bowl over readers with undefinable parameters (the numbers you give), is meaningless, totally so.
Your assertions need proof, the same you ask for. But simply from anectdotal experiences, you seem to be mistaken.
Of courseYMMV
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- numbers - unclestu 22:00:28 08/12/14 (24)
- RE: numbers - cpotl 22:16:53 08/12/14 (23)
- more LOL - unclestu 23:29:46 08/12/14 (22)
- RE: more LOL - cpotl 01:24:20 08/13/14 (21)
- Changing your tune a bit - unclestu 13:54:16 08/13/14 (20)
- RE: Changing your tune a bit - cpotl 14:07:44 08/13/14 (19)
- RE: Changing your tune a bit - unclestu 15:06:32 08/13/14 (18)
- RE: Changing your tune a bit - cpotl 15:14:20 08/13/14 (17)
- AsI wrote earlier - unclestu 15:27:48 08/13/14 (16)
- Cpotl: - gusser 16:00:34 08/13/14 (15)
- Well - unclestu 18:30:49 08/13/14 (10)
- Yes, the old Kimber black wire story. - gusser 07:55:19 08/14/14 (3)
- RE: Yes, the old Kimber black wire story. - unclestu 23:36:36 08/15/14 (2)
- RE: Yes, the old Kimber black wire story. - gusser 14:13:50 08/16/14 (0)
- John Curl? - op48no1 08:53:30 08/16/14 (0)
- RE: Well - Tre' 21:27:47 08/13/14 (5)
- RE: Cpotl: - cpotl 17:28:53 08/13/14 (3)
- RE: Cpotl: - dave slagle 18:06:37 08/13/14 (2)
- RE: Cpotl: - cpotl 18:19:27 08/13/14 (1)
- RE: Cpotl: - Tre' 21:16:23 08/13/14 (0)