In Reply to: RE: Changing internal output wiring of DAC posted by MikeWI on August 10, 2014 at 18:40:43:
I was careful to insert the adjective "demonstrable" in my response to the OP. I doubt very much that the change from copper to silver wire would have any measurable effect of any significance, and I am quite sure it would be undetectable in rigorous double-blind testing.
One can see from simple order of magnitude estimates that the effect of a change from copper to silver in a situation as undemanding as a home stereo system would be quite negligible. Also, when one considers the vast lengths of ordinary copper wire that will have been used in the recording studio and the CD production plant, it is hardly plausible that changing the last few inches to silver in the home CD player is going to have much effect.
Of course, if someone is inclinded towards believing such things do matter, then, especially if they spend enough money on the modification, they may well "hear" a difference.
Chris
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Changing internal output wiring of DAC - cpotl 00:57:20 08/11/14 (78)
- RE: Changing internal output wiring of DAC - danlaudionut 05:53:02 08/11/14 (77)
- RE: Changing internal output wiring of DAC - cpotl 06:48:41 08/11/14 (76)
- Agree 100% - gusser 10:20:32 08/11/14 (1)
- RE: Agree 100% - Triode_Kingdom 13:38:54 08/11/14 (0)
- RE: Changing internal output wiring of DAC - danlaudionut 07:09:31 08/11/14 (73)
- RE: Changing internal output wiring of DAC - cpotl 10:30:14 08/11/14 (72)
- Silver does indeed react to magnetic fields differently from copper... - Cleantimestream 14:47:54 08/12/14 (60)
- RE: Silver does indeed react to magnetic fields differently from copper... - cpotl 19:50:26 08/12/14 (59)
- Perhaps if I stated in another way, copper HAS magnetic properties... surprised? 2 1/2 times More magnetic - Cleantimestream 20:17:17 08/12/14 (58)
- RE: Perhaps if I stated in another way, copper HAS magnetic properties... surprised? 2 1/2 times More magnetic - cpotl 20:21:54 08/12/14 (57)
- LOL !!!!! - unclestu 20:47:26 08/12/14 (56)
- RE: LOL !!!!! - cpotl 21:32:27 08/12/14 (55)
- RE: LOL !!!!! - Cleantimestream 06:15:53 08/13/14 (29)
- Documentation needed - Triode_Kingdom 10:43:04 08/13/14 (27)
- sigh, - Cleantimestream 12:46:52 08/13/14 (26)
- RE: sigh, - Triode_Kingdom 08:05:29 08/14/14 (1)
- RE: sigh, - Cleantimestream 12:28:20 08/14/14 (0)
- RE: sigh, - cpotl 13:19:23 08/13/14 (23)
- RE: sigh, - Cleantimestream 14:07:23 08/13/14 (22)
- RE: sigh, - cpotl 14:12:06 08/13/14 (21)
- RE: sigh, - Cleantimestream 14:20:00 08/13/14 (20)
- Speaking of rude, - The Bored 07:27:01 08/14/14 (0)
- RE: sigh, - cpotl 14:24:45 08/13/14 (18)
- You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 14:41:31 08/13/14 (17)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 14:48:09 08/13/14 (16)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Tre' 17:18:03 08/13/14 (5)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 18:02:29 08/13/14 (4)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Tre' 20:24:14 08/13/14 (0)
- RE: You poor man~nT - dave slagle 18:29:54 08/13/14 (2)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 18:45:03 08/13/14 (1)
- In a word... - op48no1 18:47:21 08/13/14 (0)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 14:54:18 08/13/14 (9)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 15:05:28 08/13/14 (8)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 15:10:58 08/13/14 (7)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 15:21:09 08/13/14 (6)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 15:34:23 08/13/14 (5)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 15:37:37 08/13/14 (4)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 15:56:28 08/13/14 (3)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 16:05:19 08/13/14 (2)
- RE: You poor man~nT - Cleantimestream 04:06:40 08/14/14 (1)
- RE: You poor man~nT - cpotl 05:34:41 08/14/14 (0)
- RE: LOL !!!!! - cpotl 06:32:54 08/13/14 (0)
- numbers - unclestu 22:00:28 08/12/14 (24)
- RE: numbers - cpotl 22:16:53 08/12/14 (23)
- more LOL - unclestu 23:29:46 08/12/14 (22)
- RE: more LOL - cpotl 01:24:20 08/13/14 (21)
- Changing your tune a bit - unclestu 13:54:16 08/13/14 (20)
- RE: Changing your tune a bit - cpotl 14:07:44 08/13/14 (19)
- RE: Changing your tune a bit - unclestu 15:06:32 08/13/14 (18)
- RE: Changing your tune a bit - cpotl 15:14:20 08/13/14 (17)
- AsI wrote earlier - unclestu 15:27:48 08/13/14 (16)
- Cpotl: - gusser 16:00:34 08/13/14 (15)
- Well - unclestu 18:30:49 08/13/14 (10)
- Yes, the old Kimber black wire story. - gusser 07:55:19 08/14/14 (3)
- RE: Yes, the old Kimber black wire story. - unclestu 23:36:36 08/15/14 (2)
- RE: Yes, the old Kimber black wire story. - gusser 14:13:50 08/16/14 (0)
- John Curl? - op48no1 08:53:30 08/16/14 (0)
- RE: Well - Tre' 21:27:47 08/13/14 (5)
- RE: Cpotl: - cpotl 17:28:53 08/13/14 (3)
- RE: Cpotl: - dave slagle 18:06:37 08/13/14 (2)
- RE: Cpotl: - cpotl 18:19:27 08/13/14 (1)
- RE: Cpotl: - Tre' 21:16:23 08/13/14 (0)
- There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - danlaudionut 11:08:45 08/11/14 (10)
- RE: There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - gusser 11:53:44 08/11/14 (9)
- RE: There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - dave slagle 13:12:50 08/11/14 (1)
- RE: There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - Steve O 05:59:49 08/13/14 (0)
- RE: There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - danlaudionut 12:18:29 08/11/14 (6)
- You forgot the obvious - unclestu 16:48:54 08/11/14 (0)
- RE: There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - cpotl 12:45:04 08/11/14 (3)
- RE: There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - danlaudionut 12:46:48 08/11/14 (2)
- RE: There's none so blind as those who will not see. (nt) - cpotl 12:50:26 08/11/14 (1)
- This is like matching wits with an unarmed man (nt) - danlaudionut 14:30:11 08/11/14 (0)
- OK, thanks for sharing your views on this. (nt) - gusser 12:23:14 08/11/14 (0)