In Reply to: RE: Latest ARRL Handbook Recommends against the Resistors posted by Triode_Kingdom on July 24, 2014 at 10:43:01:
I don't want to let go of this without at least a cursory examination of the quotation you posted:
"shunt resistors can actually create problems because they can produce a low-impedance source of damaging current to any diode that may have reached avalanche potential."
This claim raises at least one troubling question. If a diode in the string has reached avalanche potential, in other words, its PRV has been exceeded, are the resistors really the issue of concern? Isn't this a theoretical problem that doesn't exist in properly designed circuitry? If a diode avalanches, and the current path through the resistor causes junction failure, it only means the designer failed to install a sufficient number of diodes relative to the total PRV of the string.
I am also skeptical of the author's claim that the resistors provide a low-impedance source for current flow. Values for these resistors are typically in the vicinity of 470k. This seems almost insignificant as a parallel value when considering the impedance of a diode that has avalanched.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- More on This... - Triode_Kingdom 11:35:35 07/24/14 (2)
- RE: More on This... - Maxamillion 12:42:53 07/24/14 (1)
- RE: More on This... - Triode_Kingdom 13:27:29 07/24/14 (0)