In Reply to: RE: I'm not sure, but it seems you missed the point posted by Jim McShane on September 4, 2012 at 12:05:50:
I see what you are saying now, and that you didn't miss the point to anywhere near the degree that I had first assumed. I'm really not trying to fight with anyone. I'm not "right" about anything, nor do I regret that, nor can I fix that.
But I maintain that assuming one is objective about anything is basically dangerous.
And whether stating the obvious (something not disputed at all) "proves" the validity of "objectiveness", I don't know, seems like a weak argument.
Yes, we all know and agree that distortion is an inevitable part of sound reproduction. Is that an Objective observation?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- OK - GSH 12:26:56 09/04/12 (1)
- RE: OK - Jim McShane 13:24:24 09/04/12 (0)