In Reply to: RE: Where does the current come from? posted by dave slagle on August 26, 2012 at 18:16:28:
Isn't this why Morgan Jones recommends that the second choke in an LCLC filter should be much much lower in value than the first, where the first L is "critical"? He even provides a formula, I think (too lazy to drag out my copy), wherein one can calculate the optimal value of L2, but it has to do with the frequency at which the Lcrit choke becomes capacitative. This seems to be a good idea, yet almost everyone "up here" seems to use two equal value chokes in their real or hypothetical LCLC filters, LSES (where many "rules" are violated) notwithstanding.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Where does the current come from? - Lew 05:34:53 08/27/12 (75)
- RE: Where does the current come from? - tube wrangler 13:36:33 08/27/12 (74)
- "Permanently" is so inflexible... - Steve O 14:56:46 08/27/12 (73)
- RE: "Permanently" is so inflexible... - tube wrangler 20:35:16 08/27/12 (72)
- Lack of Substance - Triode_Kingdom 05:54:17 08/28/12 (71)
- RE: Lack of Substance - tube wrangler 09:59:40 08/28/12 (70)
- RE: the many and the few... - deathtube 667 11:35:52 08/28/12 (69)
- Statism?Totalitarianism? Why the politics? - Ray Moth 16:56:20 09/01/12 (6)
- RE: ??? - deathtube 667 19:10:15 09/01/12 (5)
- Statists are . . . - Ray Moth 19:59:00 09/01/12 (4)
- RE: Statists are . . . - op48no1 20:02:55 09/01/12 (3)
- RE: Statists are . . . - Ray Moth 22:46:43 09/01/12 (2)
- RE: Statists are . . . - op48no1 23:27:46 09/01/12 (1)
- RE: Statists are . . . - Ray Moth 17:35:34 09/07/12 (0)
- RE: the many and the few... - gusser 18:28:39 08/28/12 (24)
- RE: the many and the few... - tube wrangler 20:24:12 08/28/12 (21)
- RE: 100% correct... - deathtube 667 17:03:31 08/29/12 (19)
- Sycophancy - op48no1 23:29:06 08/29/12 (18)
- RE: you are wrong... - deathtube 667 17:42:24 08/30/12 (17)
- Dennis's and Jeff's eternal legacy - op48no1 23:52:02 08/30/12 (15)
- RE: are you for real? - deathtube 667 04:30:04 08/31/12 (14)
- Are YOU for real, or just a drama queen?? - Ray Moth 17:12:07 09/01/12 (10)
- RE: Are YOU for real, or cyberbully?... - deathtube 667 18:22:31 09/01/12 (9)
- RE: Are YOU for real, or cyberbully?...LOL! - Ray Moth 14:59:25 09/05/12 (1)
- RE: OK, you got me ... LOL!!! - deathtube 667 16:33:58 09/05/12 (0)
- I vote for drama queen. - op48no1 18:28:07 09/01/12 (6)
- RE: nice try... - deathtube 667 18:36:35 09/01/12 (5)
- RE: nice try... - op48no1 20:01:43 09/01/12 (4)
- RE: sorry... - deathtube 667 04:55:45 09/02/12 (3)
- RE: sorry... - op48no1 09:52:50 09/02/12 (2)
- RE: i tried... - deathtube 667 10:37:31 09/02/12 (1)
- RE: i tried... - op48no1 11:31:45 09/02/12 (0)
- RE: are you for real? - LinuxGuru 04:55:01 08/31/12 (2)
- Some things can be fixed. - op48no1 09:15:14 08/31/12 (1)
- Looks like the original link is down now - op48no1 10:33:03 09/01/12 (0)
- RE: you are wrong... - Tre' 21:53:58 08/30/12 (0)
- RE: the many and the few... - Stephen R 12:01:33 08/29/12 (0)
- RE: the many and the few... - cpotl 19:58:29 08/28/12 (1)
- RE: the many and the few... - drlowmu 00:10:24 08/29/12 (0)
- RE: the many and the few... - Triode_Kingdom 16:48:26 08/28/12 (0)
- RE: the many and the few... - mach1 16:45:19 08/28/12 (35)
- RE: the many and the few... - tube wrangler 20:49:25 08/28/12 (34)
- RE: the many and the few... - cpotl 21:17:09 08/28/12 (33)
- Slagle is the actual scientist here... - Joe Roberts 09:58:41 09/01/12 (29)
- RE: Slagle is the actual scientist here... - cpotl 12:53:43 09/01/12 (28)
- RE: Slagle is the actual scientist here... - Joe Roberts 11:20:23 09/02/12 (27)
- RE: Slagle is the actual scientist here... - cpotl 14:43:48 09/02/12 (26)
- RE: Slagle is the actual scientist here... - Joe Roberts 16:34:19 09/02/12 (25)
- RE: Slagle is the actual scientist here... - cpotl 18:00:05 09/02/12 (24)
- RE: Slagle is the actual scientist here... - Joe Roberts 19:52:04 09/02/12 (23)
- Interesting Factoid - gusser 10:25:30 09/03/12 (22)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - Joe Roberts 11:34:06 09/03/12 (19)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - gusser 13:46:58 09/03/12 (18)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - LinuxGuru 14:02:46 09/03/12 (3)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - gusser 15:00:17 09/03/12 (2)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - LinuxGuru 04:12:02 09/04/12 (1)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - gusser 11:03:18 09/04/12 (0)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - Joe Roberts 14:02:40 09/03/12 (13)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - gusser 15:15:35 09/03/12 (12)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - Joe Roberts 17:24:23 09/03/12 (7)
- Skin effect! - gusser 11:35:32 09/04/12 (1)
- RE: Skin effect! - Joe Roberts 12:24:02 09/04/12 (0)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - cpotl 17:50:34 09/03/12 (4)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - Joe Roberts 18:27:56 09/03/12 (3)
- Addendum - Joe Roberts 18:50:47 09/03/12 (2)
- RE: Addendum - cpotl 19:34:31 09/03/12 (1)
- RE: Addendum - Stephen R 05:33:11 09/04/12 (0)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - cpotl 16:41:33 09/03/12 (3)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - Joe Roberts 20:13:10 09/03/12 (2)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - cpotl 23:47:36 09/03/12 (1)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - Joe Roberts 00:53:22 09/04/12 (0)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - dave slagle 10:40:59 09/03/12 (1)
- RE: Interesting Factoid - gusser 10:57:27 09/03/12 (0)
- RE: the many and the few... - drlowmu 07:50:13 08/29/12 (1)
- RE: the many and the few... - cpotl 08:23:29 08/29/12 (0)
- Thanks Chris, Well Said! - Triode_Kingdom 21:40:00 08/28/12 (0)