In Reply to: RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply posted by dave slagle on August 25, 2012 at 09:33:29:
Dave,
I am sorry. I have tried in numerous posts to have a discussion with you, but I always "get lost" when speaking audio with you. You have a singular, advanced capability to lose me, and I cease talking, often because I do not fully understand either the subject matter, or, what you are bringing up.
My apologies about hijacking, I am not sure at all where you are going, coming from, or how relevent the discussion is when comparing these two different supply approaches.
I know you do very good work, (you have wound things for me) have a fine reputation, but I'll be dammed if I don't often seem to get lost when you post. Maybe I am at fault, maybe not, I really don't know. I always wanted to explain this to you, so now I have.
VERY respectfully,
Jeff Medwin....see you in October !!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply - drlowmu 11:08:25 08/25/12 (9)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply - hennfarm 14:17:45 08/26/12 (1)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply - drlowmu 17:14:25 08/26/12 (0)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply - dave slagle 15:39:37 08/25/12 (6)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply - mqracing 22:58:11 08/26/12 (1)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply - drlowmu 07:57:09 08/27/12 (0)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and mikeyb's supply - drlowmu 19:43:42 08/25/12 (3)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and the munchausen reply. - dave slagle 22:00:41 08/25/12 (2)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and the munchausen reply. - Tre' 09:22:31 08/26/12 (0)
- RE: Consider PSUD 2 and the munchausen reply. - drlowmu 22:09:07 08/25/12 (0)