In Reply to: See ...."You're neglecting the behavior of capacitors" posted by drlowmu on March 8, 2011 at 12:58:07:
"It is a simple fact that the capacitor will always rob the output tube for available current in order to maintain its charge."
And thank goodness for that - it's the only thing standing between us and feeding 120Hz directly to the amplifier. That article really is rubbish.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- More Defective Thinking - Triode_Kingdom 16:01:14 03/08/11 (49)
- RE: More Defective Thinking - Tre' 17:21:50 03/08/11 (34)
- Listen to basic engineering - TonyB 09:27:50 03/09/11 (8)
- RE: Listen to basic engineering - drlowmu 04:45:45 03/10/11 (7)
- I GUESS JACK ELLIANO IS A JOKER... - wheezer 10:16:55 03/10/11 (5)
- No, He is not........ - drlowmu 23:28:51 03/10/11 (4)
- Well now, that dissertation says it all. - wheezer 12:36:08 03/11/11 (1)
- RE: Well now, that dissertation says it all. - drlowmu 17:38:44 03/11/11 (0)
- Jeff, You're shouting. - Lew 11:19:46 03/11/11 (1)
- Its only selective emphasis Lew. (nt) - drlowmu 17:39:53 03/11/11 (0)
- I believe .. - mikeyb 05:35:58 03/10/11 (0)
- Because... - JLH 07:34:21 03/09/11 (23)
- Sorry, this is nonsense. - op48no1 09:04:36 03/09/11 (0)
- RE: Because... - Tre' 08:31:02 03/09/11 (10)
- RE: Because... - JLH 19:05:56 03/09/11 (4)
- RE: Because... - Tre' 20:10:18 03/09/11 (3)
- RE: Because... - JLH 08:13:43 03/10/11 (2)
- RE: Because... - Ray Moth 12:49:59 03/11/11 (0)
- RE: Because... - Tre' 08:21:09 03/10/11 (0)
- BTW the answer is C1 - Tre' 08:45:57 03/09/11 (4)
- compare a critical supply filter - Tre' 09:37:00 03/09/11 (3)
- RE: compare a critical supply filter - wheezer 13:49:58 03/09/11 (2)
- RE: compare a critical supply filter - Tre' 15:05:58 03/09/11 (1)
- RE: compare a critical supply filter - wheezer 14:24:53 03/10/11 (0)
- Nonsense - Triode_Kingdom 08:23:02 03/09/11 (7)
- All the EE books must be wrong then - JLH 18:53:07 03/09/11 (6)
- RE: All the EE books must be wrong then - mikeyb 05:30:14 03/10/11 (2)
- RE: All the EE books must be wrong then - JLH 08:15:14 03/10/11 (1)
- RE: All the EE books must be wrong then - mikeyb 08:46:03 03/10/11 (0)
- RE: All the EE books must be wrong then - Tre' 20:14:51 03/09/11 (2)
- RE: All the EE books must be wrong then - JLH 08:19:26 03/10/11 (1)
- RE: All the EE books must be wrong then - Tre' 09:44:08 03/10/11 (0)
- RE: Because... - PakProtector 07:57:01 03/09/11 (2)
- RE: Because... - richardson.sean 08:35:00 03/09/11 (1)
- RE: Because... - PakProtector 10:18:09 03/09/11 (0)
- RE: More Defective Thinking - PakProtector 03:16:12 03/09/11 (0)
- Quit 'yer silly flaming - drlowmu 16:35:24 03/08/11 (13)
- Not making a fool of himself - Ray Moth 09:56:29 03/09/11 (11)
- Really ?? - drlowmu 23:15:27 03/10/11 (10)
- Yes, really !! - Ray Moth 03:39:33 03/11/11 (9)
- RE: Yes, really !! - drlowmu 06:24:18 03/11/11 (8)
- RE: Yes, really !! - Ray Moth 13:26:05 03/11/11 (0)
- How about that! You're right - and everyone else is ignorant! - wheezer 12:53:53 03/11/11 (0)
- Sorry, you're wrong, Jeff. - op48no1 10:15:34 03/11/11 (5)
- Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours - drlowmu 17:50:18 03/11/11 (4)
- RE: Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours - op48no1 19:32:50 03/11/11 (3)
- RE: Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours - drlowmu 00:00:21 03/14/11 (2)
- RE: Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours - Ray Moth 00:54:16 03/14/11 (1)
- Excessive, - drlowmu 07:31:11 03/14/11 (0)
- I have to agree... - op48no1 04:47:30 03/09/11 (0)