Home Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

Good question on "Ultra-Linear".

Hi.

I don't know why this shared O/P load topology was so called "Ultra-linear". Technically, it is sorta kinda a blend-up of a pentode efficieny & a triode low-distortion transfer.

If you compare a U-L transfer chart, you will see the transfer traces look like a very distored triode transfer curve, kinked in a way towards a pentode curve. The curve forms of course change per the tapping percentage on the primary of the O/P iron.

Although commonly it was 43%, but Mullard used 20% & LEAK used 50%.

Both Peter Walker of QUAD, & Williamson objected using the term
"ultra-linear" & preferred the more appropriate terminology of "distrributed load", to which I concur.

Put asisde the O/P power efficiency being much better than a trioide, which IMO, is the objective of U-L design, its transfer curve clearly told us it can't outperform a triode's linearity.

So why called it "ultra linear"? I scratched my head on this terminology. IMO, it could be a marketing tactics, who knows?

c-J



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Herbie's Audio Lab  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Good question on "Ultra-Linear". - cheap-Jack 13:39:39 03/20/07 (1)


You can not post to an archived thread.