In Reply to: Why do some people dislike UL? posted by Ray Moth on March 17, 2007 at 14:12:56:
1. It abuses screens by exceeding their voltage and power ratings.2. It uses pentodes inappropriately. For proper operation of pentode, screen voltage should remain constant. In UL, both plate and screen voltages vary, causing non-linearity.
3. UL achieves lower Zout and distortion via negative feedback from plate to screen; the NFB loop involves OPT. Exactly same effects are achieved by applying global NFB from OPT secondary in most true pentode amplifiers.
If there is any advantage of UL over pentode, I would like to hear arguments. So far I see only disadvantages.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 3 reasons why UL is inferior to triode or pentode. - sser2 16:12:09 03/17/07 (8)
- approching triode operation with pentode power - Ralph 11:17:03 03/19/07 (4)
- Re: approching triode operation with pentode power - Ray Moth 19:11:44 03/19/07 (3)
- Re: approching triode operation with pentode power - Jim McShane 06:59:52 03/20/07 (2)
- Re: approching triode operation with pentode power - Ralph 09:34:04 03/20/07 (1)
- Re: approching triode operation with pentode power - Jim McShane 13:34:12 03/20/07 (0)
- Reason No. 4 - Triode_Kingdom 16:23:52 03/18/07 (0)
- Re: 3 reasons why UL is inferior to triode or pentode. - Ray Moth 03:13:56 03/18/07 (0)
- Re: 3 reasons why UL is inferior to triode or pentode. - Eli Duttman 03:08:02 03/18/07 (0)