In Reply to: WinAudioMLS? posted by twystd on October 13, 2006 at 14:28:05:
John Atwood (over on the ClariSonus blog) has done some preliminary research, and found a mild degree of load sensitivity for the Harmonic Equalizer (or Harmonic Balancer) circuit - there's also some tuning required for the distortion profile of the tube. The tuning wasn't very critical, though - the lowest distortion tubes (DHT's) were at one end of the adjustment, and triode-connected pentodes and IDHT's were towards the middle.The circuit does strongly reduce not only 3rd-harmonic, but all odd harmonics, out to the 9th and greater. Interestingly, in an obscure publication in the 1935 American Projectionist magazine, Bell Labs/WE mentions that feedback is most suitable for high-distortion amplifiers - referring to their own 91A SET amplifier, which does use feedback - but the Harmonic Equalizer was reserved for lower-distortion amplifiers, such as their 86 and 92 amplifiers. This is the opposite of the conventional wisdom we have today of non-feedback SET's and feedback PP amplifiers.
John and Mark Kelly came up with an interesting model, equating the balanced amplifier to a balanced modulator, with the WE circuit controlling the common-mode return current between plate and cathode. John also found the relevant patent: 1,970,325, filed by by John G. Kreer, assigned to Bell Labs, and granted in August 14, 1934.
If I wasn't working on getting ready for the RMAF, I'd have posted this already on the blog.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Look forward to your results - Lynn Olson 19:16:02 10/15/06 (4)
- BTW, nice blog, but I don't seem to be able to find the John Atwood WEHE info. (nt) - twystd 15:06:21 10/16/06 (0)
- Thanks Lynn! (long) - twystd 14:55:32 10/16/06 (2)
- I would avoid CCS on the cathodes - Lynn Olson 17:05:36 10/16/06 (1)
- Thanks again Lynn, looking forward to Clarisonus blog info when you guys get time. Have fun at RMAF (nt) - twystd 17:52:34 10/16/06 (0)