In Reply to: RE: Analog, Cassette, R-R, and Co-mingling of Such posted by Dave Pogue on September 11, 2013 at 09:39:03:
This is the sentence which is potentially misleading to folks of lesser intellect than you and I:
"Besides, the resulting open reel tapes via an Otari MX5050 BII2 and deHavilland 222 tapehead preamp sound better (well, to me) than the original cassettes. "
The only reason I haven't sent my team to your house to set you straight is that you included the disclaimer "well, to me". ;)
But then you went and said this: "I do find it amazing how much the latter sounds like the former."
Well, geez, Dave. Which is it? Better, or similar? I would hope "similar", even "nearly identical". That would indicate that the r-r machine/tape isn't imparting a new sonic signature/tonal quality onto the inputted audio signal.
Btw, I love your TV programs. ;)
:)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Analog, Cassette, R-R, and Co-mingling of Such - Inmate51 09:58:55 09/11/13 (6)
- This is wearying. - Dave Pogue 10:35:53 09/11/13 (5)
- What was the commercial cassette worth noting? - jusbe 02:51:29 09/12/13 (3)
- RE: What was the commercial cassette worth noting? - Dave Pogue 05:11:02 09/12/13 (2)
- And another one to note.... - kootenay 16:09:32 09/13/13 (0)
- Thanks. - jusbe 22:43:02 09/12/13 (0)
- RE: This is wearying. - Inmate51 14:27:03 09/11/13 (0)