208.125.21.226
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: Bruch/Hindemith posted by TGR on November 03, 2009 at 07:32:07
Thanks for your comments! Don't think that two audiophiles can ever agree on anything :)
Here goes. The reason for my picking the Bruch may rest in what faults we're able to forgive or listen through. When push comes to shove, there's not a classical recording with solo artist that I listen to that isn't spotlit. Heifitz. Starker. Oistrakh. Rubinstein (the worst offender). You name it. So I really can listen through that quality while you can't. Pick your poison :)
Why I really liked the Bruch. Stupendous dynamic range. Superlative tonality esp. strings from high to low. A sense of hall second to none. So in the end, to me when you added up the plusses and minuses, I really thought the Wilkinson captured almost all of the essential ingredients that make up a classical concert.
On the other hand, the Arnold to me still sounds too lean and slightly to the cool side (some my say like Spectral gear) of neutral.
Myles B. Astor
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: