Tech Square

Doing 48dB L-R filters in analogue, instead of using the (digital) DEQX ... problems?

121.220.23.164

OK guys, the wonderful DEQX can be had as a 3-way digital XO which also allows you to correct for XO-induced phase anomalies.

Now, a 24dB L-R XO has one driver a full 360 deg behind the other. In a 24dB XO setup, the two drivers are connected in phase ... but is there in fact a "360 deg phase correction" which needs to be done, to make the 2 drivers "act as one"? (Which you can do with a DEQX but can't do with an analogue implementation of a 24dB L-R XO!)

The reason I ask is that I'm contemplating implementing a 3-way, 48dB L-R XO setup using *analogue* filters but I'm worried that, due to the lack of phase correction, it won't sound any good! :-((

Can you advise?

Regards,

Andy

Follow Ups:

RE: Doing 48dB L-R filters in analogue, instead of using the (digital) DEQX ... problems? - Presto 11:38:28 04/07/08 (1)
- I would do it active, Presto ... - andyr 15:04:05 04/07/08 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.