Shady Lane

Not so fast. There is an evidence trail here. Weight.

69.108.115.202

In Reply to: RE: Photo of the box posted by Bambi B on December 18, 2007 at 08:14:07

Let's look at the weight of each package. Unless each weighed a good five(?) pounds more than the amp weighed, we KNOW there was insufficient packing. PERIOD. So the shipper\seller, was obligated TO DELIVER a working amp, inadequately packed them. And if the weight of the box with its packing and the amp that Blakey has in his photos equals that shipped by the seller, we know that the photos show us all the packing there was, there weren't no more, no matter how the box was opened. Seller owes Blakey everything back, including shipping. He head the ability to insure the merchandise would arrive safely, if he had taken the time and expense to have them packed by a professional. It wss his job to charge Blakey more $$ and have them fixed in place in the outside boxes. AND DOUBLE BOXED with peanuts separating the inside and outside boxes.

Follow Ups:

nice try. - luigi22 07:45:23 12/22/07 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.