In Reply to: RE: NAT Se2Se tube opinions posted by morricab on January 4, 2016 at 06:40:47:
That's a hefty endorsement of the 211 based version (always enjoyed Marc Mickelson's review of the CAT JL2). Have just been curious if anyone has heard an A/B against the GM70.
Our Daedalus Athena speakers are fairly efficient at 96dB 1w/1m, so experimenting with a high quality SET design seems like a natural curiosity. If we can find a power plant that retains the transient clarity of our ss, while bringing those glorious mids, imaging, and soundstaging, then we've taken a quantum leap forward. NAT designs have piqued my interest, as from all I've been able to gather thus far, this characteristics are Dejan's goal. Slightly concerned for long term accessibility to the NOS Russian inventory that he draws from, but will have to see.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: NAT Se2Se tube opinions - Beaglebump 13:19:50 01/04/16 (1)
- RE: NAT Se2Se tube opinions - morricab 14:05:51 01/08/16 (0)