In Reply to: RE: Audio transformers and hi-resoluition digital posted by Paul Joppa on October 20, 2015 at 14:19:10:
I attended digital audio training at Bang and Olufsen in the mid-'80s. Not that I remember all that much of it, but one thing I know: resolution isn't frequency response. Resolution is the value of the increments available to reproduce the signal, or in other words, bits per volt. Within this definition, analog processing provides near-infinite resolution. Digital audio doesn't even come close. Regrettably, my hearing no longer allows me to detect differences so easily. My daughter, on the other hand, can readily discern the higher fidelity of an LP vs standard CDs, even when reproduced by my lowly tube-type circuitry. :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Audio transformers and hi-resoluition digital - Triode_Kingdom 05:57:11 10/21/15 (5)
- RE: Audio transformers and hi-resoluition digital - FlyCast 12:25:39 10/22/15 (4)
- Think about those original mastering recording from ReVox, Ampex pro recorder? (nt) - bouncy ball 23:25:38 10/30/15 (0)
- RE: Audio transformers and hi-resoluition digital - Triode_Kingdom 14:54:46 10/23/15 (2)
- RE: Audio transformers and hi-resoluition digital - FlyCast 12:04:52 10/24/15 (1)
- RE: Audio transformers and hi-resoluition digital - Triode_Kingdom 16:03:35 10/24/15 (0)