In Reply to: RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) posted by morricab on August 25, 2015 at 02:44:01:
"THis has been debunked by Keith Howard in a rather clever experiment involving software manipulation. He found that NO added distortion sounded the best. Given that this does not exist with real amplification devices (he was adding patterns of distortion to a file of music) then there is only worst, less worse and least worst."
I'd be interested to read about that; do you have a reference to an article?
Chris
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 06:52:07 08/25/15 (7)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 15:38:59 08/25/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 09:14:18 08/25/15 (5)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 15:47:59 08/25/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 09:16:15 08/25/15 (3)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 11:25:29 08/25/15 (2)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 18:03:36 08/25/15 (1)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Mr_Steady 19:04:24 08/25/15 (0)