In Reply to: RE: Consider this DC circuit for 2A3 posted by drlowmu on November 22, 2014 at 15:22:25:
Hi Jeff.I know you mean well, and like what you hear, but all I wanted to do in the first place was to contribute something useful to the guys here.
What I didn't want was for me or my equipment to become a "Hot Topic" discussion item.
Everyone on here has the right to his own favorite topology, and right or wrong, ordinary-sounding or not, he also has the right to believe in it.
In fact, believing in what one is doing is a key step towards improving anything, so give these guys a break.
I don't wish for this "praise-to-the-moon", and then "kick-to-the-Gutter", "scientific", then "non-scientific" cycle to persist any longer--it's not useful to forum members, many of whom are plenty smart enough to understand both camps..
The Flame-Outs are getting increasingly psychotic to say the least-- even to the point of denying the common IEC socket wiring topology that EVERYBODY uses!.
Let's all return to reality and common decency and do things objectively, and show due respect for different apps, methods, and listening preferences..
---Dennis---
Edits: 11/22/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Consider this DC circuit for 2A3 - tube wrangler 18:27:18 11/22/14 (5)
- RE: Consider this DC circuit for 2A3 - drlowmu 21:38:15 11/22/14 (0)
- Yes, everyone please STOP!!!! - Ivan303 20:12:18 11/22/14 (0)
- RE: Consider this DC circuit for 2A3 - GEO 19:27:45 11/22/14 (2)
- RE: Consider this DC circuit for 2A3 - GEO 06:01:54 11/23/14 (0)
- Stop looking backwards; move forward. - RC Daniel 21:39:28 11/22/14 (0)