In Reply to: WECo 91A/B--Long, but hopefully informative posted by gilmorneau on November 22, 2014 at 12:06:13:
Thank you for taking time time to write such a detailed response, it actually is a big help, and it settles some points too.
1. Input tubes will be metal 6J7. 6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. Metal version because of shielding.
2. The tone shaping network will require some playing with to get right.
3. I will use PSUD-II to model various power supply configurations, but I plan on staying with multiple series connected electrolytics, like western electric did... The challenge will be specifying an appropriate choke.
4. Output tx puts me at a loss. You seem to have tried them all, basically I would say I will buy it on spec ... Best compromise between distortion at 20 hz, -3db high frequency limit, and price. Not everyone has this info though so it may take some gambling to get it right.
5 I plan to start with as close as possible circuit to original and then optimize it, so wiide bandwidth is absolutely necessary from output tx
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Long, but hopefully informative - maxhifi 12:46:51 11/22/14 (23)
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Additional points and some corrections - gilmorneau 09:02:41 11/23/14 (7)
- ebay transformers - maxhifi 13:23:01 11/24/14 (1)
- RE: ebay transformers - gilmorneau 20:46:15 11/24/14 (0)
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Additional points and some corrections - GSH 10:50:39 11/23/14 (2)
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Additional points and some corrections - gilmorneau 17:45:55 11/23/14 (1)
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Additional points and some corrections - GSH 18:44:31 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Additional points and some corrections - maxhifi 10:21:40 11/23/14 (1)
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Shindo Info and Partridge Output Transformers - gilmorneau 20:18:33 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: WECo 91A/B--Long, but hopefully informative - Paul Joppa 21:55:13 11/22/14 (0)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - Ivan303 18:29:22 11/22/14 (13)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - maxhifi 19:09:04 11/22/14 (12)
- "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - Jim Dowdy 06:17:58 11/23/14 (7)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - Mr_Steady 10:46:30 11/23/14 (6)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - maxhifi 12:07:33 11/23/14 (5)
- 'it is not the same tube internally' - Jim Dowdy 14:01:56 11/23/14 (3)
- RE: 'it is not the same tube internally' - maxhifi 14:45:12 11/23/14 (2)
- RE: 'it is not the same tube internally' - Jim Dowdy 16:54:37 11/23/14 (1)
- RE: 'it is not the same tube internally' - Tre' 19:16:57 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - Mr_Steady 12:21:19 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - Mr_Steady 05:25:57 11/23/14 (1)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - maxhifi 10:02:35 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - RC Daniel 20:58:40 11/22/14 (0)
- Yes, I assumed as much... - Ivan303 19:36:15 11/22/14 (0)