In Reply to: RE: Semantics... posted by Naz on October 18, 2014 at 15:14:31:
"you said you've used the circuit yourself and implied it sounds good. Then, in your last post you've basically attacked it."Not at all. I've only attacked the form of the circuit that is being misused. I've pointed out exactly what constitutes that misuse, and the two ways in which the construction we're referring to as SRPP works well.
"the top tube still functions as a CF with a much lower OP impedance relative to swapping it out with a resistor"
It's neither a CCS nor a cathode follower. Take a look at the two circuits below, and tell me if you think they function the same:
Edits: 10/18/14 10/18/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Semantics... - Triode_Kingdom 17:07:04 10/18/14 (17)
- RE: Semantics... - Naz 23:19:18 10/18/14 (16)
- The Bottom Line - Triode_Kingdom 08:58:40 10/19/14 (15)
- Now this is getting tiresome .. - Naz 15:29:04 10/19/14 (9)
- RE: Now this is getting tiresome .. - Paul Joppa 19:26:44 10/20/14 (8)
- RE: Now this is getting tiresome .. - Naz 19:55:47 10/20/14 (7)
- Larger Swing - Triode_Kingdom 08:04:45 10/21/14 (6)
- One last try at convincing you ... - Naz 06:13:54 10/23/14 (5)
- RE: One last try at convincing you ... - Triode_Kingdom 13:21:35 10/23/14 (4)
- RE: One last try at convincing you ... - Naz 14:47:52 10/23/14 (3)
- SPICE Results - Triode_Kingdom 19:47:41 10/23/14 (2)
- The ASC Files here for anyone to verify! - Naz 22:36:52 10/23/14 (1)
- RE: The ASC Files here for anyone to verify! - Triode_Kingdom 08:53:13 10/24/14 (0)
- How to Improve It - Triode_Kingdom 10:13:44 10/19/14 (4)
- OK, for the sake of furthering the discussion ... - Naz 17:39:38 10/19/14 (3)
- That's a different topic, so I'm out - Triode_Kingdom 20:04:58 10/19/14 (2)
- Not so fast ... - Naz 21:34:27 10/19/14 (1)
- Simulation - Triode_Kingdom 12:50:34 10/20/14 (0)