66.74.191.120
I've finally decided to settle the SET Vs. PP amplifier argument for myself once and for all. I want to build a 300B SET. I have already gotten some Transcendar OPTX's, now I'm looking at designs. There is no shortage of them on the internet. I'm not yet evolved to the point where I can see or understand the advantages of a certain design over another. As a matter of fact, it will be a small miracle if I can pull it off at all. No one needs to talk me out of this, or down sell me to something cheaper or less involved. I want an amp that is going to be a VERY good example of the SET philosophy. I am interested in a design that will have enough bass to handle rock, and I have some concerns afetr reading some people's experience with less than adequate bass response. But rock is only about 30% of what I listen to. I have NEVER heard a SET amplifier, and it really doesn't matter if in the end I don't like it, as I'll pass it on.
So, which design? JE Labs, Angela, the Sound Practices WE91A, Walton's design? I have been looking at Thorsten's design (Legacy, see link)with the tube regulated B+ The PS looks a bit daunting to me, but I could probably figure it out after posting a few hundred questions here on DIY. Anyway, I don't need a ton of power as my speakers are at the top of the efficiency chain. But, I want that MAGIC everyone describes, without a bunch of sweet syrup, but with the type of dynamics to handle ROCK when I get the itch...experiences and suggestions welcome here...more schematics, also welcome.
"I KNOW you can hear it, but are you REALLY listening?"
Edits: 10/03/09Follow Ups:
Post a Followup:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Go Green ]
[ Take5 ]