123.211.229.117
In Reply to: RE: Hmmmmmm... posted by KlausR. on July 03, 2009 at 23:19:52
My main point was that absorption which is less than 100% efficient can most certainly be beneficial, as you find with your ceiling, and that there are porous absorbers which are just as effective as membrane absorbers like your ceiling.
Whether or not you're unwilling to recommend treatment to anyone, the fact remains that you've chosen it in your room and quite extensive treatment at that. As I've said previously, if I covered my ceiling area with absorption as effective as that in your ceiling, the amount of absorption in my room would be quite a bit greater than what I've got in the treatments I have installed. Whether or not you're prepared to accept or admit the fact, your room contains quite significant acoustic treatment and the treatment most people here are talking about or adopt is often significantly less than you're using. That being the case, perhaps you might consider being a little less critical of them for considering/using treatment since they're getting similar benefits in kind to what you're getting and you adopted the approach you did quite deliberately in order to achieve at least some of those benefits.
David Aiken
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: