![]() |
Room Acoustics Forum by Rives Audio Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share you ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Thanks for the clarification... posted by clio09 on August 13, 2007 at 17:34:41:
How to calculate the 72 degree angle: use Tan36 degrees. Tan 36 degrees = (.5 x distance between tweeters) divided by (distance from plane of speakers to listening position). The value of this is 0.726.
Let's take my case. My ears are roughly 1.99 metres in front of the speaker plane so let's call it 2 metres for simplicity. That means that half the distance between the tweeters will be (0.726 x 2) metres or 1.452 metres. The distance between the tweeters will be twice that or 2.9 metres. In my case it's actually 2.6 metres which puts my angle at a bit over 66 degrees as I said.
Nathan Lloyd's suggestion that "the distance between the speakers (tweeter to tweeter) equal 20% - 30% of the distance between the speakers and listening position" is going to demant a short wall placement. You're talking about a sine of around .1 to.15 which translates to an angle of 11.5 degrees to 17.2 degrees if the distance between speakers and listening position is a straight line drawn from the speaker to the listening position. If you're talking about the distance to the plane of the speakers, then the angles are a little narrower. You aren't going to get a wide soundstage with that sort of placement, in fact you'll get a very narrow one. I think that's one of the most extreme recommendations I've ever seen. Put the speakers much closer together and you may as well go back to mono. You're definitely not going to do his sort of setup in a long wall placement. It's most definitely a short wall placement approach.
David Aiken
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Thanks for the clarification... - David Aiken 18:23:36 08/13/07 (11)
- I made an error in the formula from Eighth Nerve... - clio09 18:50:23 08/13/07 (10)
- Oops... - David Aiken 23:26:28 08/13/07 (9)
- RE: Oops... - clio09 07:43:05 08/14/07 (8)
- RE: Oops... - David Aiken 21:05:08 08/14/07 (7)
- That is the number I came up with as well... - clio09 10:56:57 08/15/07 (6)
- RE: That is the number I came up with as well... - David Aiken 23:45:18 08/15/07 (5)
- I calculated Tan45 and came to the same conclusion... - clio09 07:01:04 08/16/07 (4)
- RE: I calculated Tan45 and came to the same conclusion... - David Aiken 19:05:25 08/16/07 (3)
- I'll keep that in mind as I experiment with the distance. (nt) - clio09 19:33:14 08/16/07 (2)
- New news from the mobile speaker room - David Aiken 13:45:35 08/18/07 (1)
- Well now you've gone and thrown a wrench in it... - clio09 07:21:50 08/19/07 (0)