In Reply to: RE: Sorry, but posted by inguz on October 17, 2013 at 11:21:14:
I'm afraid you misread my post, too. What I said was that it was discovered that higher slew rate didn't correspond to better sound. I didn't intend to suggest there are studies, particularly technical studies. I suspect it would require someone who has moderately good listening skills to appreciate the trade-off of sound and slew rate.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Sorry, but - geoffkait 12:01:31 10/17/13 (8)
- Discovered, by who, and when? - inguz 13:03:51 10/17/13 (7)
- RE: Discovered, by who, and when? - geoffkait 13:29:10 10/17/13 (6)
- RE: Discovered, by who, and when? - jrlaudio 20:02:27 10/17/13 (5)
- concur, High Slew rate.is one of Spectral's goals and is discernable flesh and.bone traded for speed*nT - Cleantimestream 19:27:08 10/28/13 (1)
- Ya gotta love Spectral's verbiage. - geoffkait 04:50:51 10/29/13 (0)
- RE: Discovered, by who, and when? - geoffkait 06:33:18 10/18/13 (2)
- RE: Discovered, by who, and when? - john curl 08:51:56 11/08/13 (1)
- RE: Discovered, by who, and when? - geoffkait 06:09:43 11/09/13 (0)