In Reply to: Audio System Performance (a rant) posted by Goober58 on December 5, 2012 at 08:49:34:
"The greater the diversity of the recordings used in the evaluation, and thus component selection, the more chance of successful playback (ie. enjoyment of the music) of new music. I doubt very much this system will sound as good as the "best" system with ideal recordings (but given great recordings it will sound great) or will it measure the best."
Sounds to me like this would be a system that really isn't the "best" at all, but rather one that simply homogenizes good and bad recordings into a more listenable melee of music. I really think a lot of audiophiles buy REALLY good equipment and then try to dumb it down with magic cables and extremely old/rare/NOS tubes to deal with the fact that some of their most treasured music is recorded very very poorly.
Audiophiles are like race car drivers who want a race car that is "the best"... that will work on dry track, wet track, snow covered track, dirt track, and track with large pot holes in it.
Cheers,
Presto
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Presto 21:02:53 12/05/12 (12)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Tony Lauck 12:40:06 12/06/12 (3)
- GASP! - Presto 09:42:00 01/03/13 (2)
- Lewis Layton and Bob Fine - Tony Lauck 12:59:34 01/03/13 (1)
- Of course, - geoffkait 08:08:46 01/04/13 (0)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Goober58 05:43:34 12/06/12 (7)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Presto 15:32:11 12/06/12 (6)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Tony Lauck 13:22:37 12/07/12 (4)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Bill Way 12:13:14 01/15/13 (0)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Presto 15:43:45 12/07/12 (2)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Tony Lauck 16:46:56 12/07/12 (1)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Presto 07:57:28 12/10/12 (0)
- RE: Audio System Performance (a rant) - Goober58 20:47:20 12/06/12 (0)