In Reply to: Re: Seebeck/peltier... posted by jneutron on August 23, 2003 at 09:01:31:
Jneutron, I have suffered your jibes and insinuations for more than long enough. Just because you cloak it inside scientific platitudes, doesn't make it any more correct.
For the record, you have measured nothing in the audio realm to the best of my knowledge, and have little ability or inclination to do so. You have derided: Jon Risch, Dr. Hawksford, and me in the same way. You always throw out some 'scientific principle' that 'might' detract from our efforts, but you make no effort to show how it could, or whether it is an appropriate criticism. This just wastes our time, but I presume it makes you feel better in some way. Enough is enough.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl 09:54:43 08/23/03 (31)
- Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - jneutron 10:22:54 08/23/03 (30)
- Re: Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - john curl 13:06:57 08/23/03 (29)
- Re: Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - jneutron 16:29:53 08/23/03 (28)
- Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - Commuteman 17:29:51 08/23/03 (27)
- Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - jneutron 12:54:34 08/24/03 (26)
- Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - john curl 15:37:42 08/24/03 (25)
- Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - jneutron 07:59:53 08/25/03 (24)
- Can you stop arguing with JC and describe what you think might be happening? - Commuteman 09:09:25 08/25/03 (8)
- Who's arguing? I'm being bashed for trying to explain. - jneutron 11:21:13 08/25/03 (7)
- Are you sure you can use this Seebeck/Peltier cause and effect model? - Commuteman 12:18:56 08/25/03 (6)
- I forgot to add.. - jneutron 17:20:41 08/25/03 (0)
- I'll stick to this thread. - jneutron 12:31:19 08/25/03 (4)
- Can we get to some ballpark numbers to see if it's significant? - Commuteman 13:41:47 08/25/03 (3)
- You're killin me... - jneutron 15:56:18 08/25/03 (2)
- I think we're using the same numbers.. - Commuteman 17:28:12 08/25/03 (1)
- AHA!!!!! So that's where the error is... - jneutron 17:46:53 08/25/03 (0)
- Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - john curl 08:50:17 08/25/03 (14)
- JC..you really have to read the posts.... - jneutron 10:29:16 08/25/03 (13)
- Re: JC..you really have to read the posts.... - john curl 13:36:44 08/25/03 (10)
- Hi John - jneutron 15:21:15 08/25/03 (9)
- Re: Hi John - john curl 16:47:15 08/25/03 (8)
- Re: Hi John - jneutron 17:04:43 08/25/03 (7)
- Re: Hi John - john curl 20:16:24 08/25/03 (6)
- Re: Hi John - jneutron 21:34:29 08/25/03 (5)
- And BTW..You never did say who Dr. Van den Hul was.. - jneutron 21:48:10 08/25/03 (4)
- Everyone is entitled to their opinion.... - Charles Hansen 22:03:03 08/25/03 (3)
- Hmmm. - jneutron 05:41:31 08/26/03 (0)
- Hellllooo Charles... - jneutron 03:45:13 08/26/03 (1)
- OH, and Charles..... - jneutron 04:55:27 08/26/03 (0)
- Peltier effects are reversible with current direction - Commuteman 11:43:41 08/25/03 (1)
- AHA..gotcha - jneutron 11:58:44 08/25/03 (0)