In Reply to: Re: But is recording technique getting better? posted by jneutron on August 22, 2003 at 10:46:40:
I really can't hear a direct tone much above 14Khz.
Which makes me think that how we "hear" above 20Khz is
by changes in image location and size and shape.Why else have two ears, if not to hear these subtle
timing differences?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: But is recording technique getting better? - mfc 11:05:58 08/22/03 (13)
- Re: But is recording technique getting better? - jneutron 11:13:26 08/22/03 (12)
- This I do not understand.... - jensw 11:09:30 08/25/03 (6)
- Re: This I do not understand.... - jneutron 13:23:36 08/25/03 (5)
- Re: This I do not understand.... - jensw 14:29:23 08/25/03 (4)
- The interesting connection - Commuteman 17:38:21 08/25/03 (1)
- Re: The interesting connection - jneutron 18:38:17 08/25/03 (0)
- Re: This I do not understand.... - jneutron 16:41:29 08/25/03 (1)
- Let's leave it like this, here, way in and down. NT. - jensw 19:19:18 08/25/03 (0)
- I like this explanation - Commuteman 14:19:04 08/22/03 (2)
- Re: I like this explanation - john curl 16:00:27 08/22/03 (1)
- Re: I like this explanation - jneutron 08:07:22 08/25/03 (0)
- Re: But is recording technique getting better? - mfc 11:26:46 08/22/03 (1)
- Now there's an interesting question.... - Commuteman 11:28:55 08/22/03 (0)