In Reply to: RE: No (long) posted by crazed49@sonic.net on April 9, 2011 at 22:38:38:
My point was that if the musician himself were deaf, and there were no other people present to hear the music, the purpose for the musician playing in the first place becomes somewhat irrelevant.Of course, we're not counting a deaf composer who can imagine music in his head. Nobody can hear him imagine music any more than he can hear the music he composes. That disconnect will always be there despite the fact his compositions are incredible and those who hear his music are moved.
Cheers,
Presto
Edits: 04/13/11
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: No (long) - Presto 09:52:01 04/13/11 (1)
- RE: No (long) - Tony Lauck 19:39:41 04/13/11 (0)