In Reply to: RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire posted by Tony Lauck on October 29, 2010 at 10:56:19:
I don’t know if it is the same work but I did some consulting for Gary Kendall at Northwestern U once, who was investigating “stereo hearing” and he commented that in the investigation he did, that some people were able to detect an inter-aural difference corresponding to one wl at 200KHz.
Now, in questioning, he explained that was a time difference one detected and NOT a reflection on the bandwidth of ones hearing.
It was his finding that with the equipment of the day (in the early 90’s) that a sampling rate of 200KHz was sufficient to capture what we could detect (by monitoring brain waves) if not consciously hear. Some of the hf things seem to involve a brain response but no conscious awareness of it, that is to say you register a sound physiologically but you don’t hear it per say. That is different than hearing loss where you don’t register the sound or hear it.
Fwiw, to reproduce a square wave well enough that it looks essentially perfect on an oscilloscope, the system needs a bandwidth that extends from about 1/10 to about 10X the fundamental F.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - "Ordinary" magnet wire - kurt s 00:15:09 10/24/10 (25)
- You're missing the point - Presto 12:39:35 02/02/11 (0)
- RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - Todd Krieger 00:55:50 10/29/10 (6)
- RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - kurt s 04:40:55 10/29/10 (5)
- RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - tomservo 08:23:31 10/28/10 (14)
- Most people are unaware - unclestu 11:55:49 10/29/10 (0)
- Thanks for the response. - kurt s 10:18:24 10/28/10 (12)
- RE: Thanks for the response. - tomservo 12:36:46 10/28/10 (11)
- You've supported Jon Risch's speaker cable idea I believe - kurt s 20:31:40 10/28/10 (10)
- RE: You've supported Jon Risch's speaker cable idea I believe - tomservo 13:03:46 10/29/10 (9)
- RE: You've supported Jon Risch's speaker cable idea I believe - kurt s 17:48:21 10/29/10 (8)
- Just a bit more thing to add - kurt s 19:41:22 10/29/10 (7)
- Oh! And an afterthought possibility - kurt s 20:36:45 10/29/10 (6)
- Where are the numbers? - Tony Lauck 08:01:27 10/31/10 (5)
- RE: Where are the numbers? - kurt s 09:35:10 10/31/10 (3)
- RE: Where are the numbers? - Tony Lauck 10:02:58 10/31/10 (2)
- numbers numbers, we don need no steenking numbers - tomservo 09:21:26 10/31/10 (0)
- YEP! - Dawnrazor 22:29:41 10/24/10 (1)
- RE: YEP! - unclestu 16:31:30 10/27/10 (0)
- RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - tomservo 11:34:26 10/29/10 (1)
- Kunchur - Tony Lauck 12:21:12 10/29/10 (0)